From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9347 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2013 14:05:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9338 invoked by uid 89); 22 Aug 2013 14:05:01 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:05:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7ME4vuf018160 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:04:57 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-142.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.142]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7ME4tPm009447 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:04:56 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Yao Qi Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Test case for entry values. References: <1376379586-24150-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1376379586-24150-2-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <87wqnggt2i.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <5214561B.4050202@codesourcery.com> <871u5nf5o3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <52155746.7060707@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:05:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <52155746.7060707@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:11:50 +0800") Message-ID: <87k3jdbz3s.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00638.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi writes: Yao> On 08/21/2013 11:02 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >> However, what do you think of the appended? >> It adds a "default" setting for addr_size. This seems to be what we >> usually want. Yao> It looks right to me. Please commit, then I can update my patch on top Yao> of it. It's in now. Tom