From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31677 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2013 17:00:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31664 invoked by uid 89); 9 Sep 2013 17:00:53 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 17:00:53 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r89H0nW5001847 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 9 Sep 2013 13:00:49 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-132.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.132]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r89H0lsw025849 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Sep 2013 13:00:48 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: Documentation for Scheme scripting References: Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 17:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Sun, 8 Sep 2013 14:12:46 -0700") Message-ID: <87k3iqj5fk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00300.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> I can imagine making a copy of all the Python docs and just changing Doug> spelling and such. Surely the Scheme API will not be just a simple copy of the Python API. Even if that is the intent it will not be true since I think it is unreasonable to require all Python changes to come with Scheme patches as well. I think the Scheme docs have to just be a whole separate section spelling everything out in Scheme terms. Though I would like to say now that this isn't really Scheme we're talking about, but Guile. There are differences. I think it would be best to be explicit about that in the docs. Tom