From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32094 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2013 17:32:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32062 invoked by uid 89); 5 Nov 2013 17:32:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:30:50 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA5HUg3t021932 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:30:42 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-94.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.94]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rA5HUeeG006162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:30:41 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix PR c++/16117 References: <1383599806-19444-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 17:44:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:04:33 -0800") Message-ID: <87k3gmrc1r.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> Do we need a NEWS entry for the change in behaviour? I don't think so. Doug> Also, and this is just for discussion's sake, Doug> I wonder if we'll ever need to handle nested quoting some day (blech :-)). Let's just not. Doug> Can you add text to indicate "quoting" here means single-quotes *only*? I'll add a link. Doug> Is 'class'::member intended to work? (static member or whatever) Doug> [It works today, but I didn't check if that's intended. I presume it is.] Doug> If so, maybe a test to verify that still works as well? I think it's probably better to leave it undetermined. On the one hand, I don't want to implement rejecting it. I think that's too harsh. On the other hand, defining it removes any flexibility in the future. Tom