From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id JLaMLZFyHWD1JAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 11:30:09 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id AA9801EFCB; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:30:09 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,T_DKIM_INVALID,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B9301EF7A for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:30:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D129239F9C11; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:30:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gateway22.websitewelcome.com (gateway22.websitewelcome.com [192.185.47.228]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6528139F4412 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:30:06 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 6528139F4412 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=tom@tromey.com Received: from cm10.websitewelcome.com (cm10.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.4]) by gateway22.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C71639C3E for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:30:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id 83zhl2i2HuDoA83zhl46vj; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 10:30:05 -0600 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=n3pnSGFynRKgVyuqgxJ/whSGcrGbmPsbzTqxFwaYGfo=; b=VVgQaZzLeus3tpP3Khh4pG8MQC zfa3Bwyc189uIYWdZNoGm8UNY4DhqRHkXcqXrCgzQs+rwr3k+LwQIeT9xsKOFNqTyg+LzlG8Lsz/J Nqb1UTU9o67gcLt3+pCU3C31l; Received: from 97-122-91-54.hlrn.qwest.net ([97.122.91.54]:42592 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1l83zg-003utK-UH; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:30:04 -0700 From: Tom Tromey To: Tom de Vries Subject: Re: [PATCH][gdb/symtab] Fix element type modification in read_array_type References: <20210205122814.GA19232@delia> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 09:30:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20210205122814.GA19232@delia> (Tom de Vries's message of "Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:28:15 +0100") Message-ID: <87k0rm4gvn.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 97.122.91.54 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1l83zg-003utK-UH X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 97-122-91-54.hlrn.qwest.net (murgatroyd) [97.122.91.54]:42592 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 6 X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" >>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries writes: Tom> Fix this conservatively by bailing out in read_array_type when not being able Tom> to construct an array type. Perhaps it should issue a complaint? It seems to me though that if gcc emits DW_TAG_generic_subrange, then gdb ought to handle it. Tom