From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19957 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2009 23:17:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 19949 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jun 2009 23:17:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_37,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-gx0-f205.google.com (HELO mail-gx0-f205.google.com) (209.85.217.205) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:17:14 +0000 Received: by gxk1 with SMTP id 1so3768276gxk.0 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:17:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.79.4 with SMTP id c4mr3587266agb.120.1245539832690; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:17:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hydrogen.gmail.com (207-172-203-39.c3-0.upd-ubr7.trpr-upd.pa.cable.rcn.com [207.172.203.39]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 5sm3199072agc.15.2009.06.20.16.17.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:17:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87iqiqzea1.wl%naesten@gmail.com> From: Samuel Bronson To: Chris Genly Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb.texinfo patch for -var-list-children (2) In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.3 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00542.txt.bz2 At Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:30:57 -0700, Chris Genly wrote: > >> + For C/C++ structures there are several psuedo children returned to > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0= =A0 =A0 =A0 ^^^^^^ >=20 > You are pointing to the word "there". I believe "there" is correct. > Are you thinking it should b e "their"? Actually, those ^^^^^^ are under "psuedo". I guess maybe your email isn't displayed in a fixed-width font?