From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21681 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2012 19:11:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 21673 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Sep 2012 19:11:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:11:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8QJBa1T026424 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:11:36 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8QJBZb8029527 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:11:36 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [3/3] RFC - optional patch to restore DW_AT_data_member_location References: <87628cfbg2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87fw6n71co.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:11:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87fw6n71co.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:38:31 -0600") Message-ID: <87ipb0y4yg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00603.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> This patch reimplements DW_AT_data_member_location for variables Tom> appearing in a Fortran common block. Tom> Here's the refreshed patch. Tom> I believe I've addressed all the comments. Tom> Regtested on x86-64 F16. I'm going to check this in shortly. Tom