From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19220 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2013 18:24:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 19212 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Feb 2013 18:24:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_STOCKGEN,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:23:59 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1EINwVf009044 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:23:58 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1EIK3mc016929 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Feb 2013 13:20:06 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [3/3] unconditionally call via SYMBOL_COMPUTED_OPS References: <871udlhzzb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130207163233.GA15297@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87d2wbt445.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130208182734.GA17552@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:24:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130208182734.GA17552@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Fri, 8 Feb 2013 19:27:34 +0100") Message-ID: <87ip5uiwq4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00367.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> I have filled in the missing frame base cleanup, now is the frame Jan> base vs. location separation better understandable IMO (or maybe Jan> just to me, not sure). Sorry about the delay on this. I like this patch too. I will roll it into my patch #2 and commit it sometime after the release branch is made. thanks, Tom