From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11380 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2013 21:52:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 11366 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Feb 2013 21:52:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:52:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1ILqkkw019498 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:52:46 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1ILqiBT010143 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:52:45 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [0/10] RFC: remove obj_section field References: <87txp98l6a.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130218213925.GB22143@adacore.com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:52:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130218213925.GB22143@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:39:25 -0800") Message-ID: <87ip5p5lxv.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00482.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: >> Joel, I will push a new branch for you to test, if you don't mind. I'll >> send email when it is ready. Joel> Of course. I am really sorry I still haven't had the time to test it. Joel> For the record, I agree to this being checked in HEAD prior to my Joel> testing, and I will deal with the consequences after something ever Joel> went wrong. I don't think it is that much of a rush to go to that extreme. In practice (to my surprise) it has been a pretty easy branch to rebase. And I'm sure we'll find bugs no matter when it goes in, I am fine with taking the more patient approach. I'll push the branch tomorrow. Take your time testing it. Tom