From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13330 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2013 15:04:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 13317 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2013 15:04:55 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 15:04:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r27F4eIi032053 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 10:04:40 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r27F4dDp018261 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Mar 2013 10:04:39 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Keith Seitz Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org ml" Subject: Re: [RFA] Constify gen_printf/ax_string References: <51379F85.4050005@redhat.com> <87vc94i4ea.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <5137BBB6.30009@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 15:04:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5137BBB6.30009@redhat.com> (Keith Seitz's message of "Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:57:10 -0800") Message-ID: <87ip53i73s.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00291.txt.bz2 Keith> Well, not entirely. This is just the first round. All I did is xstrdup Keith> the input to parse_exp_1 and pass that *as is* to the subroutines. My Keith> plan is to keep pushing this down as much as possible as an attempt to Keith> get things going at least in a piecemeal/manageable way. YMMV. Ok, not quite as huge as I'd imagined, but still it will be good to have. Keith> I have a local branch here that I have modified the parsers and a Keith> bunch of other stuff, too. That patch is already quadruple the size of Keith> the this (as yet unsubmitted) patch. With that, there is still a Keith> phenomenal amount of work to do, but I will keep plugging away at it Keith> as time permits. Super. Tom