From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [WIP] TI msp430 CIO support
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 14:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ip2dogvw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130516212358.23f3bcdb@mesquite.lan> (Kevin Buettner's message of "Thu, 16 May 2013 21:23:58 -0700")
>>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> writes:
Kevin> The debugger based driver uses a simple breakpoint driven
Kevin> implementation. The debugger places a breakpoint on a known location
Kevin> which is always called when debugger-based I/O is to be performed.
Kevin> When the breakpoint at that location is hit, the debugger reads the
Kevin> details of the system call and its parameters from a memory based
Kevin> buffer. The debugger writes back the output of the system call to the
Kevin> same buffer. (See my patch for the exact details.)
I was also curious why this wasn't done on the stub side and just have
the stub emit the output packets.
Kevin> One of my early implementations of this functionality used a normal
Kevin> (but hidden) GDB breakpoint with a command list whose last command
Kevin> was "continue". This is similar to the way that dprintf is implemented.
Another way is to have a hidden breakpoint and override its check_status
breakpoint_ops method. Then, have this method always set bs->stop = 0.
This won't work for dprintf, since dprintf wants various user-visible
breakpoint tweaks to also work; but I think it would work fine for your
case.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-20 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-17 4:24 Kevin Buettner
2013-05-17 6:36 ` Joel Brobecker
2013-05-17 8:43 ` Yao Qi
2013-05-17 21:44 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-05-17 23:10 ` Kevin Buettner
2013-05-20 14:39 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2013-05-21 16:00 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ip2dogvw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox