Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jose.marchesi@oracle.com (Jose E. Marchesi)
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] testsuite: sigall.exp: handle SIGLOST/SIGPWR conflict in sparc64 targets
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iov6w3g9.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877gd4t72x.fsf@oracle.com> (Jose E. Marchesi's message of "Wed,	23 Oct 2013 16:06:30 +0200")


ping

    Hi.
    
    In sparc64 SIGLOST and SIGPWR have the same signal number.  The
    following patch fixes gdb.base/sigall.exp accordingly.
    
    Tested in sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu.
    
    2013-10-23  Jose E. Marchesi  <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
    
    	* gdb.base/sigall.exp (test_one_sig): gdb identifies SIGLOST as a
    	SIGPWR in sparc64.
    
    	* gdb.base/sigall.c (main): In some targets SIGLOST and SIGPWR
    	have the same signal number.  Handle this situation.
    
    diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigall.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigall.c
    index 110029d..68f3ecb 100644
    --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigall.c
    +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigall.c
    @@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ return 0;
     int
     gen_PWR ()
     {
    -#ifdef SIGPWR
    +#if defined(SIGPWR) && (!defined (SIGLOST) || SIGPWR != SIGLOST)
       kill (getpid (), SIGPWR);
     #else
       handle_PWR (0);
    @@ -1662,7 +1662,7 @@ main ()
     #ifdef SIGUSR2
       signal (SIGUSR2, handle_USR2);
     #endif
    -#ifdef SIGPWR
    +#if defined(SIGPWR) && (!defined (SIGLOST) || SIGPWR != SIGLOST)
       signal (SIGPWR, handle_PWR);
     #endif
     #if defined (SIGPOLL) && (!defined (SIGIO) || SIGPOLL != SIGIO)
    diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigall.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigall.exp
    index b1b8597..4bfb199 100644
    --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigall.exp
    +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigall.exp
    @@ -39,12 +39,20 @@ proc test_one_sig {nextsig} {
         set need_another_continue 1
         set missed_handler 0
         if $this_sig_supported then {
    +	set esig $thissig
    +
     	if { $thissig == "IO" } {
     	    setup_xfail "i*86-pc-linuxoldld-gnu" "i*86-pc-linuxaout-gnu"
     	}
    +	# In SPARC64 systems SIGLOST==SIGPWR and gdb identifies the raised
    +	# signal as PWR.
    +	if { $thissig == "LOST" && [ istarget "sparc64-*-linux*" ] } then {
    +	    set esig "PWR"
    +	}
    +
     	gdb_test "continue" \
    -	    "Continuing.*Program received signal SIG$thissig.*" \
    -	    "get signal $thissig"
    +	    "Continuing.*Program received signal SIG$esig.*" \
    +		"get signal $esig"
         }
         if [ istarget "alpha-dec-osf3*" ] then {
     	# OSF/1-3.x is unable to continue with a job control stop signal.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-03 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-23 14:04 Jose E. Marchesi
2013-12-03 11:58 ` Jose E. Marchesi [this message]
2013-12-03 12:07   ` Mark Kettenis
2013-12-03 12:53     ` Jose E. Marchesi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87iov6w3g9.fsf@oracle.com \
    --to=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox