From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id FDUgIOsOyWDicQAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:34:51 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 7635D1F163; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:34:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEA911E939 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:34:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120FA3893C7B for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:34:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 120FA3893C7B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1623789290; bh=18p6R5pMhjpIcaUvnfzh4R+V6fDZ94wCxjd4TTvyAds=; h=To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=B0Fwt21jY8f2yJ3O4/k4ioSiFbMdVd2KNxcAfFOp3H/0jSBERYf7P9YU4ciUv9rv8 w3cbhxKaTGMckrgrzjNenXXMgLTom6lYQ2uYKtO/JPhTXiX0OYtsbXx6VFz66TWnow YPbgepmRvTg4JmZV3OM1YCLRfNbFgaw9/ugF6LF4= Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB09A3893C53 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:32:56 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org EB09A3893C53 Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-96-1Soha35ZOWOqeeKDpl6Gjw-1; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 16:32:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 1Soha35ZOWOqeeKDpl6Gjw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1BEF100C611; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (ovpn-115-60.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.60]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AE3960C0F; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:32:49 +0000 (UTC) To: Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches Subject: Re: Problems with email delivery from sourceware? References: <83czsn3y5h.fsf@gnu.org> <871r93w0jg.fsf@igel.home> <838s3b3w9h.fsf@gnu.org> <20210615171410.kv7wzwxuj7uhw3cc@gwenhwyvar> <83zgvr2fl2.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 22:32:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83zgvr2fl2.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches's message of "Tue, 15 Jun 2021 20:38:33 +0300") Message-ID: <87im2eg973.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Florian Weimer via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Florian Weimer Cc: Lancelot SIX , schwab@linux-m68k.org Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" * Eli Zaretskii via Gdb-patches: > But if I was the only one who experienced these strange delays, then I > don't want to waste bandwidth on these issues anymore. Thanks for > taking the time to look at the message I sent as an example. I encountered similar delays just before VERP was enabled for sourceware.org. Apparently it was not possible to figure out the cause of the mail delays based on the available Postfix logs. As I result, I don't know if it was Red Hat's email infrastructure or sourceware that caused the delay. Like in your case, the Received: lines only showed that the hand-off between the two domains did not happen in a timely fashion. Thanks, Florian