From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10878 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2012 16:01:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 10868 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2012 16:01:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:01:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3CG1AI1016537 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:01:11 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3CG192G027967 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:01:10 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Yao Qi Cc: Subject: Re: RFC: add .dir-locals.el References: <87bonj8aa0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4F8614A8.6040800@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4F8614A8.6040800@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:32:56 +0800") Message-ID: <87hawp0wje.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00308.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi writes: Yao> Do you think it is useful to add some code here to check code style or Yao> check ARI rules? Let's try it. If people don't like it, we can always move the code out of .dir-locals.el and into some new .el that developers can optionally load somehow. Yao> With this change, when emacs opens gdb files for the first time, it Yao> prompts to ask apply risky local variables. Not sure GDB contributors Yao> using emacs are comfortable with this or not. I don't think it is a big deal. Yao> I have other emacs lisp snippets to do other checks, and personally, I Yao> find they are quite useful. If this is acceptable, I'll push them out Yao> one by one. Sounds fantastic. Tom