From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10638 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2012 21:30:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 10626 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2012 21:30:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:30:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA8LUf5i013536 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 8 Nov 2012 16:30:49 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA8LUHMs004448 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Nov 2012 16:30:25 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Andrew Burgess , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Add fullname field in disassembly output References: <506DB4B8.5030001@broadcom.com> <5085B9D5.80508@broadcom.com> <50913B7F.10707@redhat.com> <5093A785.3060103@broadcom.com> <5093E786.2090909@redhat.com> <5098FEF0.60503@broadcom.com> <83d2zq39un.fsf@gnu.org> <509A7960.3010306@broadcom.com> <509A82BF.5090609@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:30:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <509A82BF.5090609@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:48:15 +0000") Message-ID: <87haozhjfa.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00213.txt.bz2 Andrew> Just so I'm clear, should I consider this a block to committing Andrew> this patch? Pedro> No. I didn't see this go in yet, but based on reading the thread, I think everything has been approved (docs conditional on some minor tweaks). Just FYI. Tom