From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17225 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2013 15:19:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 17211 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jan 2013 15:19:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:19:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0IFJCeT004914 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:19:12 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0IFJALJ031377 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:19:11 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: "Abid\, Hafiz" Cc: Hui Zhu , "Zhu\, Hui" , "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add CTF support to GDB [1/4] Add "-ctf" to tsave command References: <50AC3217.6040608@mentor.com> <878v9k5g46.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87hamy0x0q.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:19:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Hafiz Abid's message of "Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:27:50 +0000") Message-ID: <87hamea58x.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00431.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Abid" == Abid, Hafiz writes: Abid> I tested your patch and found a few problems. I used 'tsave -ctf Abid> output' and then used babeltrace to get a text dump of the output. Thanks. I was going to look at this patch today but then saw your note. I think I'll wait for these issues to be resolved. Tom