From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2359 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2013 17:39:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 2290 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jan 2013 17:39:01 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:38:53 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0LHcqQ6010116 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:38:53 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0LHUb6N024086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 12:30:44 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: call bfd_init References: <87pq1bsq82.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 17:39:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87pq1bsq82.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Fri, 11 Jan 2013 08:18:21 -0700") Message-ID: <87hama30le.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00483.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> Technically, a user of BFD is supposed to call bfd_init before calling Tom> any other functions from the library. Tom> bfd_init is a no-op, so right now nothing notices. But, I figured it Tom> would be safe to add the call in case this ever changes. I'm checking this in now. Tom