From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9669 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2013 14:47:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9660 invoked by uid 89); 29 Apr 2013 14:47:47 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:47:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3TEleLq021269 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:47:40 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3TElcc9003761 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:47:39 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: "Tedeschi\, Walfred" , "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix display of structures/bitfields in register description. References: <1366812163-27865-1-git-send-email-walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> <87wqrrn7ki.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87fvyek9ec.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:56:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:59:34 -0400") Message-ID: <87haip75rp.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00870.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Daniel> They have a different header because they're supposed to be embedded Daniel> in things that run on the target which are not necessarily Daniel> GPL-compatible. I figured out with the FSF what an appropriate notice Daniel> would be for that case. I'd generally rather we use that notice for Daniel> all target XML files, even in the testsuite, to prevent someone Daniel> copying the GPL'd version into something by accident - not a big deal, Daniel> though. It is totally fine with me. Thanks for explaining this. Tom