From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16976 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2013 17:26:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16943 invoked by uid 89); 5 Jul 2013 17:26:24 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_TIME,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.112) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jul 2013 17:26:23 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 18:20:53 +0100 Received: from d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.13) by e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.146) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 18:20:52 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5C117D801A for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 18:27:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.217]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r65HQ8UB51511402 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 17:26:09 GMT Received: from d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r65HQJpX030076 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:26:19 -0600 Received: from br87z6lw.de.ibm.com (dyn-9-152-212-143.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.212.143]) by d06av06.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id r65HQICe030059; Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:26:19 -0600 From: Andreas Arnez To: lgustavo@codesourcery.com, Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] wp-replication: Fix test case loop References: <87ppuxasyo.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> <51D6F295.2070306@codesourcery.com> <87li5laq6w.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> <51D6FF33.3010501@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 17:26:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <51D6FF33.3010501@codesourcery.com> (Luis Machado's message of "Fri, 05 Jul 2013 14:15:31 -0300") Message-ID: <87hag8c405.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-TM-AS-MML: No X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13070517-3548-0000-0000-000005DC1A3D X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 Luis Machado writes: > What do you think of forcing the testcase to use non-contiguous areas > for the watchpoints instead of using a testcase that does not > work/test properly for s390? > > What if we add watchpoints every x bytes or so? Would that be enough > to make s390 give up on using a single hardware watchpoint for a big > range of contiguous addresses? No, the current code never gives up. > This looks good for me if the above is too tricky to implement. OK, thanks. Uli, would you commit this then?