From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24978 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2013 20:58:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24958 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jul 2013 20:58:21 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:58:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6NKwBcI020303 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:58:11 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-128.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.128]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6NKw95V013078 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:58:10 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: yao@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] native mingw32 gdb, eol format References: <1373936767-14858-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <83ppuj2p7r.fsf@gnu.org> <51E9DBD4.4070605@codesourcery.com> <87a9ldyu8k.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83siz5w0ve.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <83siz5w0ve.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:08:05 +0300") Message-ID: <87haflxace.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00547.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: Eli> How about a special option to GDB, which would switch the GDB standard Eli> streams to binary mode? I wouldn't even mind that, though I think an option that is only useful to the test suite is not as nice as localizing the fix to the test suite somehow. Tom