From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26934 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2014 18:06:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26831 invoked by uid 89); 14 Apr 2014 18:06:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:06:09 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s3EI66tm008732 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:06:06 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-93.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.93]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s3EI65E0016230 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:06:05 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Andrew Pinski Cc: Pedro Alves , "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: RFC: fix PR backtrace/15558 References: <87li6nghhz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <51B11E66.70102@redhat.com> <87mwqjw613.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Andrew Pinski's message of "Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:56:17 -0700") Message-ID: <87ha5vrdki.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00274.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Pinski writes: Andrew> What happened to this patch, I don't see any reference to it latter Andrew> on? I think I am running into the same problem as this patch is Andrew> fixing. I never got back to fixing it according to Pedro's review. As I recall it isn't entirely trivial because for a good fix one would need to expose some new Python methods for use by the frame filter code. Tom