Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] Add support to catch groups of syscalls.

Sergio Durigan Junior
2014-10-12T22:52:54Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 956 bytes --]

On Sunday, October 12 2014, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:

> I dislike the proposal of adding prefixes/suffixes to the group names
> because I feel it might be harder to type, and also because it feels a
> little unusual, if we consider the common way of providing arguments to
> commands.
>
> Using -g to specify syscall groups, as Sergio said, has also the
> advantage of providing us with an intuitive command to list available
> syscall groups, by saying "catch syscall -g" with no arguments.
>
> So, my vote goes to using '-g' for each syscall group we want to
> catch. Is that ok for you, guys?

Yeah, this is still OK to me :-).

> I will still wait a few days to see if anyone has more suggestions
> before sending the updated patch that fixes the syntax and the other
> things you guys pointed out.

Good idea.

Thanks,

--
Sergio
GPG key ID: 0x65FC5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]