From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id NIWoKJgJfGFhawAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:47:52 -0400 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 92F741F0BB; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:47:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 672AE1EE18 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:47:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18103857827 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:47:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A18103857827 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceware.org; s=default; t=1635518870; bh=pp11eBbEz/cgtir9QKv5maT4lZ9L64Ot7QUHCSibZ+o=; h=To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:From:Reply-To:Cc: From; b=T27d5rUaNGzgPlQqP7Rskw8jre0KAZWiTXd/OgATmfMnHBk2Xs8HOKhEhdLsOwg3V J/6Eut+P1lpcjafeu2/claPC0V9+Kw+xSXj0BGla5KlPXmLm/XSxGq8jMZFMerH4X9 JxQnvaMUvSLoHzMVssUwIwQVGrOnmff7lsrVGTtA= Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 623AA3858410 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 14:47:32 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 623AA3858410 Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id p204so1182883iod.8 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 07:47:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=pp11eBbEz/cgtir9QKv5maT4lZ9L64Ot7QUHCSibZ+o=; b=E64N1CV5A29kmumpRmGdxQAgvOqf0GzfzOoQXt4TflIC/Qtnc/uXSAiZJbBt/drawz H7Qli4J1EtsnbA3nMHqww/uh+0CQ48AKMpDY8xYZhmjRGl4vApEXLK0YXq8h+9i8Bjyb JFd036AoKtUbAzUl8pMReM9UWaBbnYFp9lHxxuXr7BP0kCDGBhdxq1tfHr4XyFVHOnoT X7cwavVS7c+JPTO3D31vbetWLnKzEOiF4jVMwfkSmmqRj3WAOiBKwv6YSppA66Be6i7L gcRL5eaWy0D9lf1pJ9yYl+2E6M+1DYtFhSRVFFEl00UCqwcMtqgszAJ/SZtGEDdUA88w xblw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530GFUcVnNicB0Q2zpQWiGfhxYqJ0TiqtzJNyq43Amc3dw0eVpZW eMlvmFxW41/hkMP7WTnC89dRlg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxHCinsPSaBmjGAAGUN5kNkCYneRFeH/qgz7dxa1bkAhr3LNj8oeJ81sPiaqp9npfYZ/38EBw== X-Received: by 2002:a02:a907:: with SMTP id n7mr8612181jam.96.1635518851860; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 07:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from murgatroyd (75-166-134-234.hlrn.qwest.net. [75.166.134.234]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g13sm3452004ild.87.2021.10.29.07.47.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 29 Oct 2021 07:47:31 -0700 (PDT) To: Luis Machado Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Avoid self-test failures on x86-linux References: <20211018194308.177367-1-tromey@adacore.com> <87y26clzyv.fsf@tromey.com> <325373ef-31b2-6403-329b-cf8e3fa45c26@linaro.org> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 08:47:30 -0600 In-Reply-To: <325373ef-31b2-6403-329b-cf8e3fa45c26@linaro.org> (Luis Machado's message of "Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:28:50 -0300") Message-ID: <87h7cznb0d.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Tom Tromey via Gdb-patches Reply-To: Tom Tromey Cc: Tom Tromey via Gdb-patches , Tom Tromey Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" Luis> Isn't this a broader issue? I recently reported some failures in the Luis> gdb.base/all-architectures-2.exp, where disassembling fails due to Luis> (apparently) some recent changes in error reporting. Do you have a link? I've only run into this particular problem, and when I wrote the fix, I looked through opcodes to find other similar instances, and didn't find any. Tom