From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24337 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2012 18:19:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 24321 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jul 2012 18:19:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:18:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6PIIihF007683 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:18:45 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6PIIgj6019020 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:18:43 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOpIFDDtm5pdHo=?= Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA 5/4 take 2] Improved linker-debugger interface References: <20120719151913.GF25093@redhat.com> <20120719211740.GB2947@klara.mpi.htwm.de> <20120720100222.GC3153@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:19:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120720100222.GC3153@redhat.com> (Gary Benson's message of "Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:02:22 +0100") Message-ID: <87fw8fhfgd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00567.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Gary" == Gary Benson writes: >> It pretty much looks like there is still some quadratic behaviour >> somewhere... Gary> Yes. It's difficult to avoid given the current architecture. This sounds like a good follow-up patch :-) If it is a reasonable amount of effort, and you aren't totally sick of this area, I guess you could just do it. Otherwise a bug report to note the difficulties would be nice. Tom