From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23334 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2012 16:37:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 23099 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Aug 2012 16:37:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:36:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7OGaqCv015225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:36:52 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7OGaovl027821 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 12:36:51 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jeff Kenton Cc: Subject: Re: GDB test suite question References: <5037A142.3020505@tilera.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5037A142.3020505@tilera.com> (Jeff Kenton's message of "Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:44:02 -0400") Message-ID: <87fw7cl00t.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00740.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Kenton writes: Jeff> What is a reasonable target number for "unexpected failures" when Jeff> running the test suite for a specific processor? In addition to what Jan said, if it is a new port, I think you just have to look through a bunch of them and see what is happening. Tom