From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15421 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2012 01:37:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 15411 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Oct 2012 01:36:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:36:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9H1aTB5028927 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:36:29 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9H1aRf3005004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:36:28 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: printing 0xbeef wchar_t on x86-windows... References: <20121015190052.GH3034@adacore.com> <87wqyq6tcl.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20121016224342.GH3050@adacore.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20121016224342.GH3050@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:43:42 -0700") Message-ID: <87fw5d7uck.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00267.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Tom> Before putting something like that in, though, I would like to look at Tom> Keith's pending patch that reworks this code. Maybe he already fixed Tom> the bug. Joel> OK. I couldn't find the patch in question, so I couldn't test it. It is here: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-08/msg00780.html Tom> Also, I think this should have a regression test. Joel> We actually already have one (see wchar.exp). Oh super, thanks. Tom