From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6741 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2012 18:32:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 6733 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Nov 2012 18:32:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:32:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qADIWb5w027281 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:32:38 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qADIWa8i025827 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:32:37 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: handle "MiniDebuginfo" section References: <87wqxuel5k.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <509D47B5.6020302@redhat.com> <87haoycvqi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50A2437D.7080301@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <50A2437D.7080301@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:56:29 +0000") Message-ID: <87fw4d8ibf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00325.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> I did some experimenting, and found that the problem is in args Pedro> passed to remote_exec. Specifically, leaving input empty, while Pedro> specifying an output at the same time. Using "/dev/null" instead Pedro> works. See patch below. I wondered if /dev/null would work on Pedro> Windows, so I did a google search for remote_exec and /dev/null, Pedro> and found that returns hits in the binutils testsuite, Thanks for doing this. Tom