From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15061 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2012 19:11:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 15052 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2012 19:11:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:11:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAFJBfle021954 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:11:41 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAFJBeSB001990 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:11:40 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [0/10] RFC: use gnulib more heavily + more configure fixes References: <87obiyzns7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:11:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87obiyzns7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:09:12 -0700") Message-ID: <87fw4azno3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00421.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> Here's the patch series to rely more heavily on gnulib. Tom> Let me know what you think. One thing I forgot to note is that I didn't update the ARI code. I'll look at that in a bit. Tom