From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32395 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2013 19:13:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 32383 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jan 2013 19:13:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:13:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r09JDYXL005808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:13:34 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r09JDX8E030817 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:13:33 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: aburgess@broadcom.com (Andrew Burgess), gdb-patches@sourceware.org, ken@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Vector to scalar casting and widening References: <50EC3655.8030506@broadcom.com> <201301081905.r08J5Jol010971@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 19:13:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201301081905.r08J5Jol010971@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> (Ulrich Weigand's message of "Tue, 8 Jan 2013 20:05:19 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: <87fw2axj8i.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00183.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Ulrich" == Ulrich Weigand writes: Ulrich> With those changes, as in the modified version of the patch Ulrich> below, all OpenCL test cases now pass. As far as OpenCL Ulrich> is concerned, this would be OK to commit. Ulrich> In fact *all* of the patch looks good to me now, but I'd ask Ulrich> you wait for another couple of days in case one of the other Ulrich> maintainers wants to comment ... It looks ok to me. Tom