From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29466 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2013 14:28:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 29453 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jan 2013 14:28:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:28:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0PESH86020955 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:28:17 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0PESGYh010835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:28:16 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 6/9] Mechanical symtab->filename -> symtab_to_filename References: <20130117222242.GG16249@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87ip6q1gbo.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130124215609.GA31688@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130124215609.GA31688@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:56:09 +0100") Message-ID: <87fw1pl4lb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00625.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Tom> This spot still uses symtab->filename directly. Tom> Is that intentional? If so I think it should perhaps have a comment. Jan> Yes. Jan> + /* Check first sole SYMTAB->FILENAME. It does not need to be Jan> + a substring of symtab_to_fullname as it may contain "./" etc. */ Sorry, missed that. Tom> This spot uses filename_cmp with symtab_to_filename. Tom> Is that intentional? Tom> It seems a bit strange to me to allow the filename-display setting to Tom> control comparisons. Jan> Because this is a maintenance command. Ok, I see. I'm satisfied. Tom