From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4310 invoked by alias); 16 May 2013 17:33:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4266 invoked by uid 89); 16 May 2013 17:33:45 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 May 2013 17:33:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4GHXhGF015003 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 16 May 2013 13:33:43 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-133.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.133]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4GHXgtR016778 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 16 May 2013 13:33:43 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA 0/7] Improved linker-debugger interface References: <20130516144340.GA2105@blade.nx> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130516144340.GA2105@blade.nx> (Gary Benson's message of "Thu, 16 May 2013 15:43:40 +0100") Message-ID: <87fvxmzv62.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00636.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Gary" == Gary Benson writes: Gary> This is an updated version of a patch series I posted last year Thanks, Gary! Gary> (I underestimated the disruption a baby can bring to your life!) Haha, me too. Gary> A quick and dirty speed comparison yielded the following results: Gary> no of solibs 128 256 512 1024 2048 4096 Gary> -------------------------------------------------------------- Gary> old interface 0 1 4 12 47 185 Gary> new interface 0 0 2 4 10 36 Gary> (time in seconds) I know we discussed this before, but I don't recall the outcome. It still looks like there is a non-linearity in there. Do you know why? It would be good to have a bug for this. Tom