From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10632 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2013 15:06:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10593 invoked by uid 89); 5 Aug 2013 15:06:12 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:06:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r75F62YM017352 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:06:02 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-128.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.128]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r75F617H024876 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:06:01 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: "Agovic\, Sanimir" Cc: "'Eli Zaretskii'" , "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: gdbserver allows for subsequent and not for additional connections. References: <1375694633-30275-1-git-send-email-sanimir.agovic@intel.com> <83txj4w5m7.fsf@gnu.org> <0377C58828D86C4588AEEC42FC3B85A71764728F@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 15:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <0377C58828D86C4588AEEC42FC3B85A71764728F@IRSMSX105.ger.corp.intel.com> (Sanimir Agovic's message of "Mon, 5 Aug 2013 14:59:58 +0000") Message-ID: <87fvuo9nzb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00147.txt.bz2 >> > old> By default, gdbserver keeps the listening TCP port open, so that >> > additional connections are possible. >> > ^^^^^^^^^^ >> > >> > new> By default, gdbserver keeps the listening TCP port open, so that >> > subsequent connections are possible. >> > ^^^^^^^^^^ Eli> Is it really such a significant difference? I'm not sure. Sanimir> Well, I agree that it might be personal taste, hence I will Sanimir> drop the patch. I think it is an improvement. I think "additional" here implies multiple simultaneous connections -- in fact, what confused you in the first place. "Subsequent" makes this differentiation clear. Tom