From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32514 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2013 19:57:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32503 invoked by uid 89); 25 Sep 2013 19:57:41 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Sep 2013 19:57:41 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8PJvanE028213 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:57:36 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-63.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.63]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r8PJvZ6E000662 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Sep 2013 15:57:35 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFA, doc RFA] Add "set debug symfile on". References: Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 19:57:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Tue, 24 Sep 2013 17:25:12 -0700") Message-ID: <87fvssisi8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00905.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> This patch adds a new debugging option: set debug symfile on Doug> For now it logs all calls through the symfile functions. Doug> Regression tested on amd64-linux. Doug> Ok to check in? It seems ok to me. This patch combines a few different things into one. For example, reordering the arguments to map_matching_symbols has no relation to the rest of the patch. We normally make other contributors split such patches. I think it is best if maintainers do this as well. Tom