From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id eiBFGzYb5Gje/SEAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2025 15:40:38 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=ATargC/O; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 5E7891E047; Mon, 06 Oct 2025 15:40:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E55A31E047 for ; Mon, 06 Oct 2025 15:40:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EC93858C5E for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 19:40:37 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 05EC93858C5E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key, unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=ATargC/O Received: from omta036.useast.a.cloudfilter.net (omta036.useast.a.cloudfilter.net [44.202.169.35]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E803858D39 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2025 19:39:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org D9E803858D39 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org D9E803858D39 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=44.202.169.35 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759779561; cv=none; b=jAU2rMWP5UWU/l50dauQBcv+euipXz4Eg/Kbj7dVFJ/YSWGO4ZsTmGXyHKkqiLRWhVLnRPzM+qMZWTzfrDg+VdlHPTvsSyeG8jrE02zosoEjeh8jQTyUxJQKgCOOuHCm5ThuOeN4+/6KJ6QyxBmbhxluAOjt0LcS+Ydy29zox1c= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1759779561; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ff9H+DzciRZxhwNz43SyEXBYSc8fhujIyYCVisrWPMg=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=HaYDqCkbyOz3shSjhtIo4zQa9GmsRiaLczNoX2K57uufLPKSlrG8OIm441f2IVMJzkaN+tNFcwolnNLiFupOwh+pbEuMVWJxTrNSzzzwamHqgFl4xblgzF39L/ZzrjxsHPuKiY1xNnfc/tyHwnPcsFsFEj+oXfYI8w6q3Vn2KcU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D9E803858D39 Received: from eig-obgw-6007b.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.30.166]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id 5r0nvs75rKXDJ5r3Jvcyld; Mon, 06 Oct 2025 19:39:21 +0000 Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id 5r3IvMjcxp0Hq5r3Ivl0I1; Mon, 06 Oct 2025 19:39:20 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=H/nbw/Yi c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=68e41ae8 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=x6icFKpwvdMA:10 a=ItBw4LHWJt0A:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=inJwZNkslMV4T5M189EA:9 a=VS4QxaUSPT0UtbFnIvSC:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+cU9zckz6C+u6j9Lxj327Tx2mZgcMdwtQ2g4ggQ9k2s=; b=ATargC/ODedszcK/o0gw91fix3 /wzw++zS5pcl65pM/FUjxBjymAX151B2JmTxyMGWfUMlUd/rrugov0zF0lHdMrqyV1YLZ/zXZsqBz rzkOM7fqh/5SxzWtVPQh5uc+e; Received: from 97-122-110-68.hlrn.qwest.net ([97.122.110.68]:60378 helo=bapiya) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.1) (envelope-from ) id 1v5r3I-00000002iuB-0H2Z; Mon, 06 Oct 2025 13:39:20 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Andrew Pinski Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, GCC Mailing List , binutils Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Add .clang-format In-Reply-To: (Andrew Pinski's message of "Mon, 6 Oct 2025 11:46:02 -0700") References: <20251006183901.1239002-1-tom@tromey.com> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 13:39:19 -0600 Message-ID: <87frbv3jmg.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 97.122.110.68 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1v5r3I-00000002iuB-0H2Z X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 97-122-110-68.hlrn.qwest.net (bapiya) [97.122.110.68]:60378 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 2 X-Org: HG=bhshared;ORG=bluehost; X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfPlOXBDlwMugv3mexF9JUer7+7kF96sEAGlgASh+WDBbdkRQtH4P5BirAio5G1XEIYu8HGTwHgRe8uJrCExIAuYMizt8xvRg6GuTK7t0ITB5oTVQidJ2 hcrYyHwsmYOFr/8pojykt5UhYlWPRe9WDoSbPEFnLAPOd4373osdahsEhzfQYPKFQo1rxY8anbQ8AfG2SOoOBcrBLDkKmWM8bVU= X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Pinski writes: Andrew> We had a small discussion about this at the cauldron and I think it Andrew> was agreed that we should include the same across at least GCC, Andrew> gdb/binutils too. IIRC gdb and gcc don't really agree on formatting. Someone who knows the gcc style well would have to go through all the settings to see. Tom