Contributor guidelines - Re: Ready for Write After Approval - Re: [PATCH v2] - Adapt to Python-3 print syntax

Jeremy Bryant
2025-10-19T19:16:44Z

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> > Looks good, thank you.
>> > Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
>> >
>> > Tom
>>
>> Thanks Tom.
>>
>> I see the patch is not yet committed.
>>
>> Would someone on the "Write After Approval" list please commit the
>> patch?
>

> I think you expect too much from the GDB maintenance processes. One
> day is nowhere near enough to ping about approved-but-not-committed
> changes.

Eli, bringing back the second-part, truncated, of my message:-

"
PS:
I'm not sure about the etiquette for following-up but presumably it's
soon after approval so the patch is still applicable to master.

The guidance here says one week for patch review only
https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ContributionChecklist
"

Perhaps my request wasn't worded properly. What is a typical wait time
that is appropriate?

To edit the file at
https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/ContributionChecklist,
do we submit ideas or patches here or in some other way?