From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9318 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2012 19:58:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 9216 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jul 2012 19:58:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:58:19 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6JJwJLs003938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:58:19 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6JJwI2i010706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:58:19 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sigall.exp and friends: centralize signals list. References: <20120719143526.8328.28449.stgit@brno.lan> <87zk6vy88i.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <500844E7.4040103@redhat.com> <87sjcny313.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <5008645A.4010601@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5008645A.4010601@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu, 19 Jul 2012 20:47:38 +0100") Message-ID: <87eho7y145.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2 Pedro> Or even: Pedro> for {set i 1} {$i < [llength $signals]} {incr i} { Pedro> which in hindsight, I have no idea why I didn't do it like that, over a Pedro> silly "if i==0 continue". :-P I didn't think of that either. Funny :-) Tom