From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5890 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2012 16:51:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 5872 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Oct 2012 16:51:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:51:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9GGpShX006221 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:51:28 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9GGpQnd003354 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:51:27 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Dmitry Kozlov Cc: , "'Stan_Shebs\@mentor.com'" , Vladimir Prus , Pedro Alves Subject: Re: PATCH fix start-time and stop-time in trace-status References: <506444DD.9040503@mentor.com> <87d317wlaa.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50699D74.2090401@mentor.com> <87mwzna6u3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <507D7654.90206@mentor.com> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <507D7654.90206@mentor.com> (Dmitry Kozlov's message of "Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:59:32 +0400") Message-ID: <87ehky8inl.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00254.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Dmitry" == Dmitry Kozlov writes: Dmitry> Pedro already asked to rewrite this patch at gdbserver-side and use Dmitry> hex instead of decimal. Dmitry> See http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-10/msg00193.html Dmitry> Could you setup one common opinion about what way is right? Sorry about that. I must not have realized the threads were linked. Please do what Pedro asks. Dmitry> It would very kind of you if you can look at other 2 related patches. IIRC one was a gdbserver patch -- I don't know much about gdbserver and generally don't review those. I don't remember why I skipped the other patch but if you can point me at it I will look. Tom