From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25492 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2012 15:42:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 25477 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2012 15:42:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:42:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA1FgAwJ007611 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 1 Nov 2012 11:42:11 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA1Fg9Cm021959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Nov 2012 11:42:10 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Yao Qi Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] Update comment of evaluate_struct_tuple. References: <1351756007-18242-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1351756007-18242-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 15:42:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1351756007-18242-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Thu, 1 Nov 2012 15:46:43 +0800") Message-ID: <87ehkdtjn2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi writes: Yao> 2012-11-01 Yao Qi Yao> * eval.c (evaluate_struct_tuple): Update comment. Ok, even obvious. I think I would have stuck this in patch #1. Tom