From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12869 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2012 20:24:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 12861 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Nov 2012 20:24:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:24:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qADKOmBc007601 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:24:48 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qADKOkLr025486 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:24:47 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Python 3 support, part 1 (non-testsuite part) References: <87mwyma6xi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87390d8hdf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87y5i571xi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87mwyl70hu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:24:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Paul Koning's message of "Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:56:10 +0000") Message-ID: <87ehjx6yk1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00340.txt.bz2 Paul> Does that mean that a make cleanup done before the try-catch is not in Paul> effect within the try-catch? Yeah. The try-catch resets the cleanup chain. I find that cleanups are a lot easier to reason about when I treat them like C++ destructors -- make them be block scoped as much as possible. Tom