From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8473 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2013 18:42:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 8409 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2013 18:42:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:41:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r03IfwlX019670 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:41:58 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r03IfuhS027062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:41:57 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [0/10] RFC: use gnulib more heavily + more configure fixes References: <87obiyzns7.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50A67DE8.8040708@redhat.com> <87r4nebuzr.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87wqwpd4hf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87ip7e2kga.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:42:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87ip7e2kga.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:24:53 -0700") Message-ID: <87ehi22jnv.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 Tom> I am going to check this series in now. Actually, I looked and it seems that this patch pulls in the gnulib errno module via a dependency. And, since this was recently backed out, I think I am going to postpone this series until that issue is worked out. Tom