From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1317 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2013 15:02:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 1306 invoked by uid 89); 2 Aug 2013 15:02:18 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:02:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r72F296n020221 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 11:02:09 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-128.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.128]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r72F27Hq006027 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 11:02:08 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] introduce parallel mode References: <1374073124-23602-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <1374073124-23602-3-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <51E7E27E.5030800@codesourcery.com> <87txjsc7mw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <51E86A71.3000301@codesourcery.com> <878v0lfb62.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <51FB7097.8020900@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 15:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <51FB7097.8020900@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:40:55 +0100") Message-ID: <87ehacdtlc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> I guess a WARNING could be a better fit: Ok, I took part of Yao's patch (thanks Yao!) and changed the code to use warning. I left my code in place to also send the inotifywatch messages to gdb.log -- this is nice to have because it interleaves the notifications with the test suite output, so you can find precisely where the bad file operation was done. I'll update the ChangeLogs and send a new series shortly. Tom