From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 61261 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2015 16:06:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 61249 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jul 2015 16:06:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:06:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24BBC4C0BD; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unused-10-15-17-51.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.17.51]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t6AG6AdK016816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:06:10 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches Subject: Re: buildbot: Fedora-i686 configuration problem References: <559FC4FA.6010801@ericsson.com> X-URL: http://blog.sergiodj.net Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <559FC4FA.6010801@ericsson.com> (Simon Marchi's message of "Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:13:30 -0400") Message-ID: <87egkgj8um.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00331.txt.bz2 On Friday, July 10 2015, Simon Marchi wrote: > Hi Sergio, > > This builder seems to have a lot of difficulty finding gcc during configure. > > http://gdb-build.sergiodj.net/builders/Fedora-i686 > > Slaves 3 and 4 seem to have this problem. The build that passed was on slave 1, > so that one seems ok. I don't know about 2. Hey Simon, Thanks for the message. Yesterday I set up a new buildslave and it's still not 100% configured for 32-bit builds :-/. Bummer. I will fix that ASAP today. Cheers, -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/