From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id AngdIva//WXuxREAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:29:26 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (768-bit key; unprotected) header.d=tromey.com header.i=@tromey.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=KUSbM18A; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 7685F1E0C0; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:29:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ACD91E08C for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:29:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18CD3858419 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:29:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from omta036.useast.a.cloudfilter.net (omta036.useast.a.cloudfilter.net [44.202.169.35]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DDF03858D1E for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:29:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 5DDF03858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 5DDF03858D1E Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=44.202.169.35 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1711128545; cv=none; b=P7E5AUS/sxMEmgKWdwkuQ5D5bcNvGAYza+dlmvjpySVyGz5tKNuG1iPAeZFLjXlPPoUjJPXCFjcqncSJnY9Ua27o7bsaoL91K4DL/ywstBfIzEAyQkd4JgyeorRC1GCzea6NnAwYOXz+gVfOov1HLNYr3uEB0vx6kiwH0KQM6dA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1711128545; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HYitxnP0GQZHH5/GpRfX6gPB8hDImiXfxbkSgtq0qIY=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=b+LgkfmCJGJd7usXOKpFKxYmpIPsKSFjUNWpytA8ohLD17cYO6rhf+3UyJ2eR82TOJflUaAd8NzEzbCxxGLpSAz3TAl884ejdUnNOi/MRVEfPelzMspAGDwCWFtq4kGf+XQicNn8mXT8CqPTMJTZMXMKWrsCllY34iQNUBD8xro= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from eig-obgw-6010a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.30.248]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id nhhGrgsUiuh6snihUr9HqU; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:29:04 +0000 Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id nihTrvQHqQufZnihTracmJ; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 17:29:03 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=eK4Vjmp1 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=65fdbfdf a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=K6JAEmCyrfEA:10 a=Qbun_eYptAEA:10 a=RtkggBvCAAAA:8 a=AWINs_dZq0sZDgyHQB8A:9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=HYitxnP0GQZHH5/GpRfX6gPB8hDImiXfxbkSgtq0qIY=; b=KUSbM18A+E/WiVs5SGj88SngWd 0JSxA4NJHzONpnkHxpmBOziQzCFeiSJu7VxPHXWMm157W1bnpb8YXoY4+5gmqwfvCOg60/MeOy9tx eqIK3U1XVW4KrV7QHiga5Dpcb; Received: from 97-122-82-115.hlrn.qwest.net ([97.122.82.115]:46096 helo=prentzel) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rnihS-004CPF-36; Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:29:03 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Dmitry Neverov Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC v2][PR symtab/30520] gdb/symtab: fix the gdb.cp/anon-struct test References: <20240123170325.752251-1-dmitry.neverov@jetbrains.com> <20240125084404.3536456-1-dmitry.neverov@jetbrains.com> <87y1bw9g3b.fsf@tromey.com> <87v86x77i1.fsf@tromey.com> <87msqvto9o.fsf@tromey.com> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 11:29:02 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Neverov's message of "Tue, 19 Mar 2024 13:16:03 +0100") Message-ID: <87edc2rx9d.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 97.122.82.115 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1rnihS-004CPF-36 X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 97-122-82-115.hlrn.qwest.net (prentzel) [97.122.82.115]:46096 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 5 X-Org: HG=bhshared;ORG=bluehost; X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfMwIlRlsxwa2g4i5ZUfM8yetpZ83423wrC3R0wGNgnysB5RqxWX5pUt/ek5MIBRwsPx4tv/KrbLQ7U4xlGssvTBZEsHczNZv9OutK0odoB35wvFZTy1W vvSzJMUzJ1R2DkDb0c5ln3TN6g6SoQrGMlCROXfKghpKPksrS+nBxLiAPRaxggXX4JKeggOaRMJvGT2TTriLT6Okje4j9r56LNE= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3015.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org >>>>> "Dmitry" == Dmitry Neverov writes: >> Do you know the current status of it? >> Unfortunately we can't accept the patches without it. Dmitry> I've sent all the papers, but we had a typo in a disclaimer, so Dmitry> I'm back to getting them fixed and signed. Hope it will be Dmitry> faster than the first round. If this is definitely happening (like it wasn't completely derailed for some reason) then IMO it's fine to update the patches and re-send them. That might hasten their landing once the paperwork is done. thanks, Tom