From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4708 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2012 15:10:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 4610 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Apr 2012 15:10:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:10:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3IFA5Fq020780 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:10:06 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3IFA4ea004893 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 11:10:05 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [commit 1/3] Import gnulib's update-copyright script References: <1325665146-31682-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <1325665146-31682-2-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <4F8EB486.5020308@redhat.com> <20120418143606.GA2852@adacore.com> <4F8ED35E.1040208@redhat.com> <20120418145225.GC2852@adacore.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 15:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120418145225.GC2852@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:52:25 -0700") Message-ID: <87d375qdo3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00586.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> Sure. Since there does not appear to be gnulib releases, I was Joel> under the impression that we'd always go with the current head, Joel> somehow. Having the hash in the script is a good idea, makes Joel> things completely reproduceable... Yes, I think most gnulib users just update it using gnulib master. Last time we discussed this, Mark K. said that our approach was to update it based on need. Recording the revision somewhere obvious (not ChangeLog perhaps but maybe a file in the "wrapping" directory, whatever it is called?) seems ok to me. Tom