From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14904 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2012 20:54:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 14896 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jul 2012 20:54:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:54:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6OKs0wO017282 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:54:00 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6OKrx6e012450 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:54:00 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Yao Qi Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] new add_setshow_string_cmd_with_notif and trace-notes. References: <1343146252-22558-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1343146252-22558-7-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 20:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1343146252-22558-7-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Wed, 25 Jul 2012 00:10:52 +0800") Message-ID: <87d33knamw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00509.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi writes: Yao> this patch is to add a new function add_setshow_string_cmd_with_notif, Yao> and register command "trace-notes". A new test case is added for it. This is ok (again pending the earlier discussion...) thanks, Tom