From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7909 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2012 19:01:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 7901 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2012 19:01:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:01:16 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA1J1COL021620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 15:01:15 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA1J1BKH024189 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Nov 2012 15:01:12 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: handle new NT_SIGINFO note in gdb References: <878vanyj3k.fsf__16012.8015945249$1351617533$gmane$org@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <878vanyj3k.fsf__16012.8015945249$1351617533$gmane$org@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:18:07 -0600") Message-ID: <87d2zxrvuw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> This patch adds support for the new Linux NT_SIGINFO core note to gdb. Pedro pointed out that this patch doesn't ensure that $_siginfo is attached to the correct thread. I have a fix for this but I am looking into writing a multi-threaded test case before resubmitting. Tom