From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8847 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2013 21:44:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 8838 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jan 2013 21:44:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:44:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0ELinBr019710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:44:49 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0ELimtf015367 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:44:48 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Siva Chandra Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Phil Muldoon Subject: Re: [RFC] New method gdb.Frame.arch_name which return's the name of frame's architecture References: Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 21:44:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Siva Chandra's message of "Fri, 11 Jan 2013 06:56:22 -0800") Message-ID: <87d2x7mobz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00296.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Siva" == Siva Chandra writes: Siva> Attached is a patch which adds a new method 'arch_name' to the class Siva> gdb.Frame. This new method returns the name of the frame's Siva> architecture as a string value. Siva> Phil Muldoon (copied in this mail) asked sometime back whether I Siva> intend to expose frame's architecture as an object by itself. All I Siva> want for now is a way to get the name of the frame's architecture. If we think we'll want to expose the architecture in the long term -- and I think we probably do -- then it seems cleaner to me to introduce the class now and just give it a single method. Tom