From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22011 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2013 15:32:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 22002 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jan 2013 15:32:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:32:19 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0FFWI29001054 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:32:19 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0FFWH0M012899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:32:18 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: fix PR 12707 References: <87r4lno936.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <50F571E6.1080003@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <50F571E6.1080003@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:12:38 +0000") Message-ID: <87d2x6lawu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00310.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> This caught my eye though. Is there still a reason for the quoting? Pedro> (I don't think I understood the original comment's reasoning Pedro> fully either.) Nope. I've removed it. I am also not sure why there was quoting before. Tom