From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21015 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2013 21:33:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 20995 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Feb 2013 21:33:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:33:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1BLXmLJ009771 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:33:48 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1BLXlAj008150 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:33:48 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] split up ui_printf, fix decfloat printing bugs References: Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Fri, 08 Feb 2013 15:32:15 -0800") Message-ID: <87d2w6pmbo.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00264.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> I don't understand this code in ui_printf: [...] Doug> It makes no sense given that the format string is parsed into pieces. Doug> Am I missing something? I don't understand it either. I also think it is wrong as-is. Doug> Regression tested on amd64-linux. Doug> Ok to check in? Looks good to me. Tom