From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9089 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2013 19:22:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9076 invoked by uid 89); 1 Aug 2013 19:22:20 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 19:22:19 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r71JMCd5031837 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:22:12 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-128.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.128]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r71JMAVx027603 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:22:11 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] introduce test suite "parallel" mode References: <1374073124-23602-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <51FA975C.3050709@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 19:22:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <51FA975C.3050709@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu, 01 Aug 2013 18:14:04 +0100") Message-ID: <87d2pxfc7x.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> It might be a good idea to force-disable this somewhere Pedro> with remote-host testing, though you're most likely aware Pedro> of that already. Yeah, I was aware of the difficulty here, and had planned to tackle it somehow; but after learning more about remote-host I think it's best to just ignore GDB_PARALLEL in this case. So, I've made this change. Tom