From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10197 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2013 15:53:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10187 invoked by uid 89); 19 Aug 2013 15:53:18 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:53:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7JFrFuX031083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:53:15 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-142.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.142]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7JFrEl2017852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:53:14 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Alan Modra Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: IBM long double little-endian References: <20130819003948.GM4024@bubble.grove.modra.org> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:53:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20130819003948.GM4024@bubble.grove.modra.org> (Alan Modra's message of "Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:09:48 +0930") Message-ID: <87d2p9llsl.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00509.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Alan" == Alan Modra writes: Alan> This teaches gdb about little-endian IBM long double. Like big-endian Alan> IBM long double, the little-endian version is an array of two doubles. Alan> The patch also deletes some unused code I found in doublest.c. OK to Alan> apply? The gdb bits look fine to me, but the libiberty bits will have to be sent to the GCC patch list for approval. Tom